If this was a woman, it would be the man's fault for not facilitating her arousal. And rarely would it lead to someone having to go to a doctor, (though there may be a therapist involved if it's a true pathological problem). However, just because it's a man, he has to go to the doctor, get pumped full of pills?
Talk about a sexual double standard. If it's a woman who doesn't want sex, it's the guy's fault or some childhood problem caused from past sexual experience and perfectly acceptable that the woman is catered to, in order to allow her to enjoy things. However, if it's a guy, it's the guy that has to change again because it's the guy's fault for not being interested.
Did anyone actually think that maybe, just maybe he's bored with it? Or possibly that he simply doesn't want sex, that maybe he wants to work on other parts of the relationship? Why does he have to be necessarily 'broken' or deficient because he doesn't want sex?
And why does this freak you out so much? He says he wouldn't care if you didn't have sex anymore. He didn't necessarily say he wasn't willing to ever have sex. Just for once, I'd like to see someone say, 'hey, work with the guy on it and find a compromise.' Because really, why should I forced to take medications and be given hormone treatment, when I'm not really sick. Why should I have my personality and desires modified when I'm perfectly happy with the way I am. (which this guy sounded like he wasn't all that perturbed about it).
Quint Notwen
Posted: 23 Sep 05:31